AI automation and transformation
We follow a real request from arrival to close, count where the hours go, then remove the repetitive part. AI gets applied where it changes that number, and nowhere else.
Bali, Indonesia. Working with teams in Singapore, Australia, Hong Kong and the US.
A technology consulting practice led by a senior engineer and delivery manager. We map how your business actually works, automate what wastes your team's day, and build the software you are missing.
Since 2008. 50+ client projects delivered. Teams of 10 to 20 engineers led.
Your team re-types the same data into three different systems.
Usually fixable in days, not months. Integration and process automation.
Customer messages arrive on WhatsApp, email and Instagram, and nothing is tracked.
One inbox, one record per customer, automatic routing. Support desk design.
You bought AI tools last year. Nobody uses them and nothing got faster.
The tool was never the problem. AI discovery, starting from your processes.
A development project is six months late and nobody can explain why.
Scope, dependencies and risk, made visible again. Project recovery.
Most engagements start with one and grow into another. Hire us for a two week assessment or for a year of delivery.
We follow a real request from arrival to close, count where the hours go, then remove the repetitive part. AI gets applied where it changes that number, and nowhere else.
Decide what to build before you spend money building it. You get a written recommendation with costs attached, not a sales pitch for a platform.
If you have developers but nobody senior running scope, priorities, risk and release, projects drift. We take that job part time, and give you a schedule you can believe.
Web, mobile and internal systems, built so someone else can maintain them. Requirements, architecture, build, handover. Senior people, no layers of account management.
Most AI projects fail the same way: they start with the technology instead of the process. We watch how work moves through your business, then apply AI only where it changes how long something takes.
Tickets from every channel get categorised, prioritised and routed, with a draft reply attached.
Removes: manual sorting and copy-paste answers
Invoices, purchase orders and contracts read, fields extracted, data written into your accounting system.
Removes: line-by-line data entry
Grounded in your own SOPs and past projects, so staff stop asking the same five people the same questions.
Removes: repeated internal lookups
Numbers pulled from the systems you run, summarised in plain language, delivered every Monday.
Removes: the weekly spreadsheet ritual
Enquiries enriched, scored against your criteria, written into the CRM with the reasoning attached.
Removes: manual research before first contact
Missing fields, mismatched totals, duplicate records. Flagged before a customer sees them.
Removes: errors found a month later
A well placed integration or a database rule often beats a language model: cheaper, predictable, no monitoring. Part of what you pay us for is being told when the answer is a two week integration rather than an AI programme.
Three common shapes. Each one has a defined end point, so you can judge the result before committing to the next piece of work.
2 weeks, fixed scope
We map your processes, score every automation opportunity by hours saved against effort, and hand back a costed plan. Most clients start here.
4 to 6 weeks
Take the top workflow from discovery. We design, build, test and deploy it, then measure what it gave back.
Monthly, part time
Someone senior owning scope, priorities, risk, stakeholders, QA and release. A few days a month, not a headcount.
Almost every one of these starts life as a spreadsheet and a WhatsApp group. That works until roughly the point you are reading this page.
The same six steps whether it ends in an automation, an integration, a new application or the advice to change nothing.
What is slow, what is expensive, and what it costs you each month. In your words, before technology is discussed.
One real request, arrival to close. Every hand-off, every system, every place it waits.
Separate what needs a person from what only needs a rule. The second kind is where the hours are.
Options with cost, effort and risk attached, including doing nothing. You decide before anyone writes code.
Short cycles, something visible every week, your team testing before go-live.
Against the baseline from step one. If it did not move the number, we say so and fix it.
We are software engineers and IT consultants who have been building systems, and running the teams that deliver them, since 2008.
Every engagement is led by a senior consultant who stays on it from kickoff to handover. No account manager in between, and no junior team learning on your project. Specialist engineers, designers and QA join as the work needs them, which is how a team of ten to twenty gets assembled for a build without you paying for a bench between projects.
Most projects fail in the gap between what the business asked for and what the engineers built. We have worked both sides of that gap, as developers, QA engineers, Scrum Masters and the people answering to the board, which means being useful in a requirements meeting and a code review on the same afternoon.
Roles this work has covered
Described by problem and outcome. Client names stay confidential unless they tell us otherwise.
Data arriving from many sources with no way to govern it. Analytics and governance applications delivered end to end, with the business in the room.
Every invoice audited by hand against complex terms. Replaced with an application that surfaces only the discrepancies worth a human's time.
Several workstreams and dates that kept moving. Turned into a prioritised backlog, visible risk, and a rhythm the business could plan around.
Customers writing in by email, WhatsApp and phone with no shared history. Consolidated into one ticketing system with automation and a knowledge base.
No. We are based in Bali and most work is remote, with clients across Southeast Asia, Australia and the US. For Bali and Jakarta clients we do process mapping on site, which is worth doing in person at least once.
Fixed price for discovery and automation sprints, monthly retainer for fractional delivery, time and materials for longer builds. Rates are quoted after the first call, once we know what the work is.
Often that is the strongest case. Good engineers with no senior delivery lead is exactly where projects drift: unclear requirements, no prioritisation, dependencies nobody tracks. The fractional PM engagement fills that, and replaces nobody on your team.
It depends on what you send and where. Before anything is built we agree what data leaves your systems, who processes it, whether it can be used for training, and where it is stored. Enterprise tiers do not train on your data by default, and sensitive workloads have regional and self-hosted options.
Where personal or financial data is involved, that decision gets written down before implementation, not after.
Then we do not use it. Discovery regularly ends by recommending an integration, a process change, or a tool you already pay for. You still get the process map and the plan, which is the part with value.
First call within a few days, discovery usually within two weeks. Build work depends on what discovery finds, and we say so honestly if the calendar does not allow it.
About thirty minutes. Bring one process that frustrates you and we will tell you, on the call, whether it is worth automating.
Bali time overlaps with Singapore, Hong Kong and most of Australia. Calls with Europe and the US are arranged around that.